Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:08:33.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Psychology, and the Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

John A. Franklin
John A. Franklin*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
*
Psychology Department, School of Behavioural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Growth in the popularity of cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) raises the issue of ensuring standards of training and practice. Because of the close association of psychology with CBT, this responsibility falls disproportionately upon psychology departments. This paper examines ways of establishing standards and argues that professional associations should lobby universities for adequate coverage of CBT in professional training programs. Means of staffing and delivering specialist courses in CBT as a means of upgrading and certifying professional standards are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 11 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Training in Cognitive and Behavioural Intervention , March 1994 , pp. 54 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennett, W.S., & Hockenstead, M.C. (1973). Full-time people workers and conceptions of the professional. Sociological Review Monograph, 20, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, A. (1992). Threats to the future of professional psychology. The Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society, 14(3), 7–8.Google Scholar
Franklin, J.A. (1993). Crisis? The Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society, 15(6), 6–8.Google Scholar
Franklin, J.A. (in press). What Crisis? The Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Franklin, J.A. (1994). A national professional degree structure for psychology. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Franklin, J., Gibson, D., Merkel-Stoll, H., Neufelt, M., & Vergara-Yiu, H. (1994). Employment trends for psychologists. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Franklin, J., Gissing, J., & Holubinskyj, H. (1994). The training and competencies of four-year educated psychologists: Employers and senior psychologists views. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Markus, E., Lange, A., & Pettigrew, T. (1990). Effectiveness of family therapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, T., & Sayette, M. (1991). Insider's guide to graduate programs in clinical psychology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Michelson, L., & Marchione, K. (1991). Behavioural, cognitive and pharmacological treatments of panic disorder with agoraphobia: Critique and synthesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 100–114.Google Scholar
O'Gorman, J.G. (1993). Undergraduate education in psychology: Training the practitioner as well as the scientist. Australian Psychologist, 28, 32–34.Google Scholar
Porter, S. (1992). The poverty of professionalization: A critical analysis of strategies for the occupational advancement of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 720–726.Google Scholar
Svartberg, M., & Stiles, T. (1991). Comparative effects of short term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 704–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, J.S. (1991). Professionalism at its worst. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 3338.Google Scholar