Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:28:23.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Application of Cognitive—Behaviour Therapy in Altering Illness Representations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Donna Goodman*
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Australia.
Shirley Morrissey
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Australia.
Deborah Graham
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Australia.
David Bossingham
Affiliation:
Cairns Base Hospital, Cairns, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Donna Goodman, PO Box 6343, Cairns QLD 4870, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that illness representations are associated with chronic illness outcomes. Accordingly, several authors have recommended that interventions aimed at improving illness outcomes should include an illness-representations component. While a few researchers have attempted to develop such interventions for chronic illness and chronic pain, no such intervention has been developed for individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic auto-immune illness which results in a variety of negative physical and psychological symptoms. This article reports on a pilot program that investigated the feasibility of a cognitive and behavioural—based intervention for treating SLE which included an illness-representations-change component. The effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual treatment for SLE was evaluated. Also investigated was whether changed illness representations had a beneficial effect on physical health and psychological wellbeing. It was found that the intervention did change participants' treatment control and emotional representations, and that perceived stress was reduced following the intervention. The importance of these findings is discussed, two rival hypotheses for the findings obtained are explored and directions for future research are suggested.

Type
Standard Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)