Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:37:31.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Conditions Associated with Low Rates of Challenging Behaviour in Two Adolescents with Multiple Disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Madonna Tucker ,
Jeff Sigafoos  and
Heidi Bushell
Madonna Tucker
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Jeff Sigafoos*
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Heidi Bushell
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
*
Jeff Sigafoos, Schonell Special Education Research Centre, The University of QueenslandQLD 4072, Australia
Get access

Extract

Analyses and interventions were conducted to reduce challenging behaviour in two adolescents with multiple disabilities. A functional analysis of each child's challenging behaviour was conducted initially. Although the results of this functional analysis showed that challenging behaviour occurred during roughly 30 to 60% of the assessment trials conducted under each of several conditions, there was one condition for each child that was associated with little or no challenging behaviour. These conditions were then manipulated using stimulusfading procedures. Initially, the stimuli associated with low rates of challenging behaviour were provided on a nearly continuous and noncontingent basis. Next, exposure to these stimuli was systematically reduced. The present studies suggest that analysis of the conditions associated with low rates of challenging behaviour may be helpful in designing interventions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 126 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association on Mental Retardation. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Bzoch, K.R., & League, R. (1991). Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Test (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, E.G. (1988). Functional equivalence as a mechanism of response generalisation. In Horner, R., Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance (pp. 221–241). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Cair, E.G., & Durand, V.M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., Newsom, C.D., & Binkoff, J.A. (1980). Escape as a factor in the aggressive behavior of two retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 101–118.Google Scholar
Davis, C., Brady, M., Williams, R., & Hamilton, R. (1992). Effects of high-probability requests on the acquisition and generalization of responses to requests in young children with behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 905–916.Google Scholar
Duker, P.C., van Druenen, C., Jol, K., & Oud, H. (1986). Determinants of maladaptive behavior of institutionalized mentally retarded individuals. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 51–56.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G., Ferro, J., & Deperczel, M. (1994). Nonaversive behavioral intervention in the community. In Cipani, E.C. & Spooner, F. (Eds.), Curricular and instructional approaches for persons with severe disabilities (pp. 117–146). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1993). The nature and extent of aggressive behaviour amongst people with learning difficulties (mental handicap) in a single health district. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37, 221–242.Google Scholar
Horner, R.H., & Day, H.M. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719–732.Google Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M.F., Slifer, K.J., Bauman, K.E., & Richman, G.S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.Google Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Pace, G.M., Kalsher, M.J., Cowdery, G.E., & Cataldo, M.F. (1990). Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 11–27.Google Scholar
Lambert, N., & Windmiller, M. (1981). Adaptive Behavior Scale, School Edition – Revised. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Mace, F.C, & Belfiore, P. (1990). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of escape-motivated stereotype. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 507–514.Google Scholar
Mace, F.C., Page, T.J., Ivancic, M.T., & O'Brien, S. (1986). Environmental determinants of aggression and disruption in mentally retarded children. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 203–221.Google Scholar
Neef, N.A. (Ed.). (1994). Functional analysis approaches to behavioral assessment and treatment [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2).Google Scholar
Oliver, C., Murphy, G.H., & Corbett, J.A. (1987). Self-injurious behaviour in people with mental handicap: A total population study. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 31, 147–162.Google Scholar
Repp, A.C., Felce, D., & Barton, L.E. (1988). Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self-abusive behaviors on hypotheses of their causes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–290.Google Scholar
Repp, A.C., & Karsh, K.G. (1994). Hypothesis-based interventions for tantrum behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 21–31.Google Scholar
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sigafoos, J., Elkins, J., Kerr, M., & Attwood, T. (1994). A survey of aggressive behaviour among a population of persons with intellectual disability in Queensland. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 38, 369–381.Google Scholar
Sigafoos, J., & Meikle, B. (1996). Functional communication training for the treatment of multiply determined problem behavior in two boys with autism. Behavior Modification, 20, 60–84.Google Scholar
Sturmey, P., Carlsen, A., Crisp, A.G., & Newton, J.T. (1988). A functional analysis of multiple aberrant responses: A refinement and extension of Iwata et al.'s (1982) methodology. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 32, 31–46.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.C., & Carr, E.G. (1992). Severe behavior problems related to social interaction: I. Attention seeking and social avoidance. Behavior Modification, 16, 305–335.Google Scholar
Vollmer, T.R., Iwata, B.A., Zarcone, J.R., Smith, R.G., & Mazaleski, J.L. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9–21.Google Scholar