Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T13:12:22.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why the TDH fails to contribute to a neurology of syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2001

Alan Beretta
Alan Beretta
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An important part of Grodzinsky's claim regarding the neurology of syntax depends on agrammatic data partitioned by the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH), which is a combination of trace-deletion and default strategy. However, there is convincing evidence that the default strategy is consistently avoided by agrammatics. The TDH, therefore, is in no position to support claims about agrammatic data or the neurology of syntax.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 23
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)