Article contents
Why the empirical literature fails to support or disconfirm modular or dual-process models
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2007
Abstract
Barbey & Sloman (B&S) present five models that account for performance in Bayesian inference tasks, and argue that the data disconfirm four of them but support one model. Contrary to B&S, I argue that the cited data fail to provide strong confirmation or disconfirmation for any of the models.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
References
- 1
- Cited by