Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T15:57:33.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why decision making may not require awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

I. P. L. McLaren ,
B. D. Dunn ,
N. S. Lawrence ,
F. N. Milton ,
F. Verbruggen ,
T. Stevens ,
A. McAndrew  and
F. Yeates
I. P. L. McLaren
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
B. D. Dunn
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
N. S. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
F. N. Milton
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
F. Verbruggen
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
T. Stevens
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
A. McAndrew
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
F. Yeates
Affiliation:
Washington Singer Laboratories, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@exeter.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Newell & Shanks (N&S) argue against the idea that any significant role for unconscious influences on decision making has been established by research to date. Inasmuch as this conclusion applies to the idea of an “intelligent cognitive unconscious,” we would agree. Our concern is that the article could lead the unwary to conclude that there are no unconscious influences on decision making – and never could be. We give reasons why this may not be the case.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 35 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunn, B. D., Galton, H. C., Morgan, R., Evans, D., Oliver, C., Meyer, M. Cusack, R., Lawrence, A. D. & Dalgleish, T. (2011) Listening to your heart: How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychological Science 21:1835–44.Google Scholar
Guillaume, S., Jollant, F., Jaussent, I., Lawrence, N., Malafosse, A. & Courtet, P. (2009) Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making. Neuropsychologia 47:2120–24.Google Scholar
Hanson, H. M. (1957) Discrimination training effect on stimulus generalization gradient for spectrum stimuli. Science 125:888–89.Google Scholar
Jones, F., & McLaren, I. P. L. (1999) Rules and associations. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Hahn, M. & Stoness, S. C., pp. 240–46. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jones, F. W. & McLaren, I. P. L. (2009) Human sequence learning under incidental and intentional conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 35:538–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Lagnado, D. A., Newell, B. R., Kahan, S. & Shanks, D. R. (2006) Insight and strategy in multiple cue learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135:162–83.Google Scholar
Livesey, E. J. & McLaren, I. P. L. (2009) Discrimination and generalization along a simple dimension: Peak shift and rule-governed responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 35:554–65.Google Scholar
Maia, T. V. & McClelland, J. L. (2004) A re-examination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa Gambling Task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:16075–80.Google Scholar
McLaren, I. P. L., Green, R. E. A. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1994) Animal learning and the implicit/explicit distinction. In: Implicit and explicit learning of languages, ed. Ellis, N. C., pp. 313–32. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spiegel, R. & McLaren, I. P. L. (2006) Associative sequence learning in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 32(2):156–63.Google Scholar