Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:31:08.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whose reproductive value?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

James S. Chisholm
James S. Chisholm
Affiliation:
Division of Human Development and Family Studies, Department of Applied Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 519 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkow, J. (1989) Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. University of Toronto Press. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988) Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In: Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective, ed. Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. & Turke., P.Cambridge University Press. [DMB]Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:1–49. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. (under review) Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. [DMB]Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., et al. (1990) International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21:5–47. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, P. … Harpending, H. (1982) Father absence and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Research 38:255–73. [JSC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, P. … Harpending, H. (1988) A sociobiological perspective on the development of human reproductive strategies. In: Sociobiological perspectives on human development, ed. MacDonald, K.. Spring-Verlag. [JSC]Google Scholar
Hilt, K. (1989) Evolution of the termination of female reproduction in Homo sapiens. Paper presented to the Evolution and Human Behavior Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. [DMB]Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. & Hamburg, B., eds. (1986) School-age pregnancy and parenthood. Aldine de Gruyter. [JSC]Google Scholar
Nortman, D. (1974) Parental age as a factor in pregnancy outcome and child development. Reports on Population/Family Planning 16:1–51. [JSC]Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1989) The psychology of human mate preferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, D. (in press) On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J.. Oxford University Press. [DMB]Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1990) The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:375–424. [DMB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press. [DMB]Google Scholar
Winikoff, B. (1983) The effect of birth spacing on child and maternal health. Studies in Family Planning 14(10):231–45. [JSC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed