Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Boice, Robert
and
Jones, Ferdinand
1984.
Why Academicians Don't Write.
The Journal of Higher Education,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 5,
p.
567.
Boice, Robert
Pecker, Gayle
Zaback, Ellen
and
Barlow, David H.
1985.
A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
744.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1985.
Tacit agreements between authors and editors.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
746.
Peters, Douglas P.
and
Ceci, Stephen J.
1985.
Peer review: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
747.
Cofer, Charles N.
1985.
Some reactions to manuscript review from a questionnaire study.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
745.
Berry, Russell L.
1985.
Administrative freedom versus academic freedom and peer reviews.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
743.
Lock, Stephen P.
1991.
Should the blinded lead the blinded?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
156.
Zentall, Thomas R.
1991.
What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
166.
Laming, Donald
1991.
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
154.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Fuller, Steve
1991.
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
147.
Wasserman, Gerald S.
1991.
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
165.
Schönemann, Peter H.
1991.
In praise of randomness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Fletcher, Jack M.
1991.
Journal availability and the quality of published research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
146.
Adams, Kenneth M.
1991.
Peer review: An unflattering picture.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Crandall, Rick
1991.
What should be done improve reviewing?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
143.
Nelson, Linda D.
1991.
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
158.
Stricker, Lawrence J.
1991.
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
163.
Cole, Stephen
1991.
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Bailar, John C.
1991.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.