Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:14:37.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is the link between propositions and memories?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Ben R. Newell
Ben R. Newell
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia. [email protected]://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/Users/BNewell/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mitchell et al. present a lucid and provocative challenge to the claim that links between mental representations are formed automatically. However, the propositional approach they offer requires clearer specification, especially with regard to how propositions and memories interact. A definition of a system would also clarify the debate, as might an alternative technique for assessing task “dissociations.”

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, S. W. & Brooks, L. R. (1991) Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120:3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U. & Waldron, E. M. (1998) A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review 105:442–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamber, D. (1979) State-trace analysis: A method of testing simple theories of causation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 19:137–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. C. (2003) The elusive dissociation. Cortex 39:177–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enkvist, T., Newell, B. R., Juslin, P. & Olsson, H. (2006) On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: Positive and negative effects on learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32:163–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1):255–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juslin, P., Olsson, H. & Olsson, A. C. (2003) Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132:133–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, B. R. & Bröder, A. (2008) Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research. Judgment and Decision Making 3:195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, B. R. & Dunn, J. C. (2008) Dimensions in data: Testing psychological models using state-trace analysis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:285–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosofsky, R. M., Clark, S. E. & Shin, H. J. (1989) Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:282–304.Google ScholarPubMed
Shanks, D. R. & St. John, M. F. (1994) Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17:367–447; discussion pp. 447–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, D. F. & Schacter, D. L. (1987) The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review 94:439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar