No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Universal Grammar and the critical age
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 1998
Abstract
Differences of opinion between Epstein, Flynn & Martohardjono (1996) and some commentators can be traced to different interpretations of Universal Grammar (UG) form or strategy. Potential full access to the form of linguistic universals in second language acquisition may be distinguished from access to UG strategy, but Epstein et al.'s dismissal of the Critical Age Hypothesis clouds their central argument.
- Type
- Continuing Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1998 Cambridge University Press