Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:07:09.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrasociality and the sexual divisions of labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

Pamela Lyon  and
Linnda R. Caporael
Pamela Lyon
Affiliation:
Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5042, [email protected]
Linnda R. Caporael
Affiliation:
Department of Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ultrasociality thesis proposes that the same “mechanistic evolutionary forces” may be at work in the evolution of insect eusociality and human ultrasociality in relation to agriculture. Wide variation in the reproductive division of labor among differing highly social phyla points to a resemblance of outcomes arising from very different selective environments and possibly different forces.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biedermann, P. H. W. & Taborsky, M. (2011) Larval helpers and age polyethism in ambrosia beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:17064–69. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107758108.Google Scholar
Burda, H., Honeycutt, R. L., Begall, S., Locker-Grütjen, O. & Scharff, A. (2000) Are naked and common mole-rats eusocial and if so, why? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47:293–303.Google Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Allon, O., Amici, F., Fichtel, C., Finkenwirth, C., Heschl, A., Huber, J., Isler, K., Kosonen, Z. K., Martins, E., Meulman, E. J., Richiger, R., Rueth, K., Spillmann, B., Wiesendanger, S. & Van Schaik, C. P. (2014) The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nature Communications 5:4747. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5747.Google Scholar
Dyble, M., Salali, G. D., Chaudhary, N., Page, A., Smith, D., Thompson, J., Vinicius, L., Mace, R. & Migliano, A. B. (2015) Sex equality can explain the unique social structure of hunter-gatherer bands. Science 348(6236):796–98. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faulkes, C. G. & Bennett, N. C. (2001) Family values: Group dynamics and social control of reproduction in African mole-rats. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:184–90. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02116-4.Google Scholar
Inward, D. J. G., Vogler, A. P. & Eggleton, P. (2007) A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of termites (Isoptera) illuminates key aspects of their evolutionary biology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44:953–67. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.05.014 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korb, J. (2007) Termites. Current Biology 17:R995–99. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.033 Google Scholar
Mace, R. (2013) Cooperation and conflict between women in the family. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 22:251–58. doi: 10.1002/evan.21374.Google Scholar
Mueller, U. G., Gerardo, N. M., Aanen, D. K., Six, D. L. & Schultz, T. R. (2005) The evolution of agriculture in insects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:563–95. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152626.Google Scholar
Nalepa, C. A. (2015) Origin of termite eusociality: Trophallaxis integrates the social, nutritional, and microbial environments. Ecological Entomology 40:323–35. doi: 10.1111/een.12197.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. R. & Brady, S. G. (2008) Major evolutionary transitions in ant agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(14):5435–40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711024105.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. E., Newson, L., Schank, J. C. & Richerson, P. J. (2013) Simulating the evolution of the human family: Cooperative breeding increases in harsh environments. PLoS ONE 8:e80753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080753.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. & Hölldobler, B. (2005) Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(38):13367–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505858102.Google Scholar