Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:45:47.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The truth and value of theories of associative learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Tom Beckers  and
Bram Vervliet
Tom Beckers
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/t.r.j.beckers/[email protected]
Bram Vervliet
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]://home.medewerker.uva.nl/t.r.j.beckers/[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, we assess the propositional approach to associative learning not only in terms of veridicality and falsifiability, but also in heuristic value. We remark that it has furthered our knowledge and understanding of human, as well as animal, associative learning. At the same time, we maintain that models developed from the association formation tradition continue to bear great heuristic value as well.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 200 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baeyens, F., Eelen, P. & Van den Bergh, O. (1990a) Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion 4:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckers, T., Miller, R. R., De Houwer, J. & Urushihara, K. (2006) Reasoning rats: Forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135:92–102.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (2003) Hume variations. Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Leung, H. T. & Westbrook, R. F. (2008) Spontaneous recovery of extinguished fear responses deepens their extinction: A role for error-correction mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 34:461–74.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R. & Lovibond, P. F. (2002) Autonomic and eyeblink conditioning are closely related to contingency awareness: Reply to Wiens and Öhman (2002) and Manns et al. (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 28:38–42.Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. S., Beckers, T. & Miller, R. R. (2008) The effect of subadditive pretraining on blocking. Learning and Behavior 36:341–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiens, S. & Öhman, A. (2002) Unawareness is more than a chance event: Comment on Lovibond and Shanks (2002) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 28:27–31.Google Scholar