Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:56:43.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical integration in motivational science: System justification as one of many “autonomous motivational structures”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Aaron C. Kay  and
John T. Jost
Aaron C. Kay
Affiliation:
Fuqua School of Business and Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. [email protected]://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~ack23/index.html
John T. Jost
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10012. [email protected]://www.psych.nyu.edu/jost/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recognizing that there is a multiplicity of motives – and that the accessibility and strength of each one varies chronically and temporarily – is essential if motivational scientists are to achieve genuine theoretical and empirical integration. We agree that system justification is a case of nonconscious goal pursuit and discuss implications of the fact that it conflicts with many other psychological goals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 146 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandt, M. J. (2013) Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104:765–85.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L. & Pyszczynski, T. eds. (2004) Handbook of experimental existential psychology. Guilford.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (2004) The resting parrot, the dessert stomach, and other perfectly defensible theories. In: The yin and yang of social cognition: Perspectives on the social psychology of thought systems, ed. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R. & Prentice, D. A., pp. 275–85. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C. & Thorisdottir, H. eds. (2009) Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A. N. & Napier, J. L. (2008) System justification as conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit. In: Handbook of motivation science, ed. Shah, J. & Gardner, W., pp. 591–605. Guilford.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. P. (2000) Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36:209–32.Google Scholar
Kay, A., Jimenez, M. C. & Jost, J. T. (2002) Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28:1300–12.Google Scholar
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P. & Spencer, S. J. (2009) Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97:421–34.Google Scholar
Laurin, K., Kay, A. C. & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2012) Reactance versus rationalization: Divergent responses to Constrained Freedom. Psychological Science 23:205–209.Google Scholar
Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., Jost, J. T. & Pohl, M. (2011) Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition 29:322–40.Google Scholar
Liviatan, I. & Jost, J. T. (2014) A social-cognitive analysis of system justification goal striving. Social Cognition 32(2):95–129 Google Scholar
McCoy, S. T. & Major, B. (2007) Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, L. T., Major, B. N. & O'Gilbert, P. N. (2012) Gender differences in entitlement: The roles of system justifying beliefs. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 34:136–45.Google Scholar
Proulx, T., Inzlicht, M. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012) Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16:285–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. & Stewart-Fouts, M. (1995) Liberating and constraining aspects of self: Why the freed bird finds a new cage. In: The self in European and North American culture: Development and processes, ed. Oosterwegel, A. & Wicklund, R. A., pp. 357–73. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Reynolds, K. J., Jones, B., O'Brien, K. & Subasic, E. (in press). System justification and social change in social and political psychology: The importance of sub-group and superordinate levels of self-categorization. European Psychologist.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J. & Kay, A. C. (2012) Toward a comprehensive understanding of existential threat: Insights from Paul Tillich. Social Cognition 30:734–57.Google Scholar