Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-21T21:54:56.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teleological perception without a biological perceiver?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2005

Théophile Ohlmann ,
Bernard Amblard  and
Brice Isableu
Théophile Ohlmann*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie et de Neurocognition, UMR CNRS 5105, 38040Grenoble CEDEX 9, France
Bernard Amblard*
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Développement et Pathologie du Mouvement, 13402 Marseille CEDEX 20, France
Brice Isableu*
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Sciences du Sport, UPRES 1609, Division STAPS, Université Paris Sud-XI, 91 405 Orsay CEDEX, Batiment 335, France
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Strong between- and within-animal differences during spatial activities lead us to claim that a given animal is directly sensitive to a given substructure of the global array. This vicarious subset is not cut out by the senses but by redundancies emerging from physical properties. We argue that the subset is not a single ambient array, or a combination of single ambient arrays, but a complex holistic part of the global array.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 888 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Commentary onT. A. Stoffregen & B. G. Bardy (2001). On specification and the senses. BBS 24(2):195–261.