Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:53:29.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tackling group-level traits by starting at the start

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Maciej Chudek  and
Joseph Henrich
Maciej Chudek
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287. [email protected]://abcs.asu.edu/Maciek/
Joseph Henrich
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. [email protected]://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We agree that emergent group-level properties are important; however, we disagree that current approaches, especially culture-gene coevolutionary (CGC) approaches, have neglected them. We explain how CGC helps demystify the tumult of humans' group-level complexity by “starting at the start,” and why (a) assuming undifferentiated individuals and (b) focusing on cooperation are actually powerful tools to this end.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 256 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atran, S. & Henrich, J. (2010) The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory 5(1):18–30.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chudek, M. & Henrich, J. (2011) Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(5):218–26.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2012) Cultural psychology. 1st and 2nd ed. Norton.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004b) Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity 69:197–214.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2009) The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior 30(4):244–60.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. & Boyd, R. (2008) Division of labor, economic specialization, and the evolution of social stratification. Current Anthropology 49(4):715–24.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012) The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1589):657–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J. & Gil-White, F. J. (2001) The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 22(3):165–96.Google Scholar
McElreath, R., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2003) Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology 44(1):122–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (2013) Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar