Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Shimojo, Shinsuke
1999.
Seeing (and hearing) the wood for the trees.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 8,
p.
291.
Kopeček, Ivan
1999.
Text, Speech and Dialogue.
Vol. 1692,
Issue. ,
p.
203.
Redford, Melissa A.
and
Diehl, Randy L.
1999.
The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Vol. 106,
Issue. 3,
p.
1555.
Poeppel, David
and
Hackl, Martin
2008.
Topics in Integrative Neuroscience.
p.
154.
Palmer, Gary B.
Thompson, Jennifer
Parkin, Jeffrey
and
Harmon, Elizabeth
2014.
Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition.
p.
145.
VanRullen, Rufin
Zoefel, Benedikt
and
Ilhan, Barkin
2014.
On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 369,
Issue. 1641,
p.
20130214.
Hauswald, Anne
Keitel, Anne
Chen, Ya‐Ping
Rösch, Sebastian
and
Weisz, Nathan
2022.
Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differently.
European Journal of Neuroscience,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 11-12,
p.
3288.
Ortiz-Mantilla, Silvia
Roesler, Cynthia P
Realpe-Bonilla, Teresa
and
Benasich, April A
2022.
Modulation of Theta Phase Synchrony during Syllable Processing as a Function of Interactive Acoustic Experience in Infancy.
Cerebral Cortex,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 5,
p.
919.
Ortiz-Mantilla, Silvia
Roesler, Cynthia P
Realpe-Bonilla, Teresa
and
Benasich, April A
2023.
Experience-dependent effects of passive auditory exposure in infants impact theta phase synchrony and predict later language.
Cerebral Cortex,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 12,
p.
7595.
Speights, Marisha L
MacAuslan, Joel
and
Boyce, Suzanne
2024.
Computer-assisted syllable analysis of continuous speech as a measure of child speech disorder.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Vol. 156,
Issue. 2,
p.
1171.