Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:59:15.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The socio-relational framework of expressive behaviors as an integrative psychological paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Jacob Miguel Vigil
Jacob Miguel Vigil
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Center for Applied Research in Child and Adolescent Development, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224-2673. [email protected]://www.unf.edu/~j.vigil/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This response shows how the socio-relational framework of expressive behaviors may be used to understand and predict social psychological processes, beyond sex differences in the expression of emotion. I use this opportunity to elaborate on several key concepts on the epigenesis of evolved social behaviors that were not fully addressed in the target article. These are: evidence of a natural history of masculine and feminine specialization (sect. R1); phenotypic plasticity and range of reactivity of social behaviors (sect. R2); exploitive and protective functions of social behaviors (sect. R3); and the role of cognition in some affective responses (sect. R4). I conclude by highlighting (in sect. R5) future directions for psychological research from a socio-relational basis.

Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 408 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, J. (2009) Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32( 3/4):249–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and loss: Attachment, vol. 1. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Craig, K. D. (2009). The social communication model of pain. Canadian Psychology 50: 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 6:178–90.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2005) The origin of the mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2009) Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences, 2nd edition. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. K. (1976) The social function of intellect. In: Growing points in ethology, ed. Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A., pp. 303–17. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1884) What is an emotion? Mind 9:188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963) On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20:410–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (2008) Sex differences in affect behaviors, desired social responses, and accuracy at understanding the social desires of other people. Evolutionary Psychology 6:506–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (submitted a) A socio-relational analysis of sex differences in the perception and expression of affect.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (submitted b) Interpersonal appraisals of reciprocity potential predict discrete affect responses in humans.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (submitted c) Political orientation varies with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M. (in preparation) Ethnic differences in the processing and expression of affect behaviors.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M., Brophy, S., Garrett, E. & McMurry, S. (submitted) Protracted facial processing biases and psychological correlates of victimization reports in healthy adults.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. M., Geary, D. C., Granger, D. A. & Flinn, M. V. (in press) Sex differences in salivary cortisol, alpha-amylase, and psychological functioning following Hurricane Katrina. Child Development.Google Scholar
Vrana, S. R. & Rollock, D. (2002) The role of ethnicity, gender, emotional content, and contextual differences in physiological, expressive, and self-reported emotional responses to imagery. Cognition and Emotion 16:165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar