Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:53:29.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social learning is central to innovation, in primates and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2007

Corina J. Logan
Affiliation:
Ecosystem Services Section, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA 98504-7016; [email protected]://www.CorinaLogan.com
John W. Pepper
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. [email protected]://eebweb.arizona.edu/Faculty/Bios/pepper.html

Abstract

Much of the importance of innovation stems from its capacity to spread via social learning, affecting multiple individuals, thus generating evolutionary and ecological consequences. We advocate a broader taxonomic focus in the field of behavioral innovation, as well as the use of comparative field research, and discuss the unique conservation implications of animal innovations and traditions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateson, P. (2003) The promise of behavioural biology. Animal Behaviour 65:1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilvers, B. L. & Corkeron, P. J. (2001) Trawling and bottlenose dolphins' social structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 268:1901–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elias, D. O., Hebets, E. A. & Hoy, R. R. (2004b) The mentality of crows: Convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306:1903–907.Google Scholar
Freeman, S. & Herron, J. C. (2004) Evolutionary analysis, 3rd edition. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. H. & Purvis, A. (1991) Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351:619–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, G. R. & Gray, R. D. (2003) Diversification and cumulative evolution in tool manufacture by New Caledonian crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:867–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. & Hoppitt, W. (2003) Do animals have culture? Evolutionary Anthropology 12:150–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. & Janik, V. (2006) The animal cultures debate. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21(10):542–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leatherwood, S. (1975) Some observations of feeding behavior of bottle-nosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Northern Gulf of Mexico and (Tursiops cf T. gilli) off Southern California, Baja California, and Nayarit, Mexico. Marine Fisheries Review 37(9):1016.Google Scholar
Marino, L., Connor, R. C., Fordyce, R. E., Herman, L. M., Hof, P. R., Lefebvre, L., Lusseau, D., McCowan, B., Nimchinsky, E. A., Pack, A.A., Rendell, L., Reidenberg, J. S., Reiss, D., Uhen, M. D., Van der Gucht, E. & Whitehead, H. (2007) Cetaceans have complex brains for complex cognition. PLoS Biology 5(5):e139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, S. (2003) Conclusions and research agendas. In: The biology of traditions, ed. Fragaszy, D. M. & Perry, S., pp. 426–40. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. A., King, A. P. & West, M. J. (2002) The context of social learning: Association patterns in a captive flock of brown-headed cowbirds. Animal Behaviour 63:2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, H., Rendell, L., Osborne, R. W. & Wursig, B. (2004) Culture and conservation of non-humans with reference to whales and dolphins: Review and new directions. Biological Conservation 120(3):427–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A., Horner, V. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005) Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature 437:737–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yurk, H., Barrett-Lennard, L., Ford, J. K. B. & Matkin, C. O. (2002) Cultural transmission within maternal lineages: Vocal clans in resident killer whales in southern Alaska. Animal Behaviour 63:1103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar