Article contents
Sins of omission and commission
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2002
Abstract
O'Regan & Noë (O&N) fail to address adequately the two most historically important reasons for seeking to explain visual experience in terms of internal representations. They are silent about the apparently inferential nature of perception, and mistaken about the significance of the phenomenology accompanying dreams, hallucinations, and mental imagery.
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2001 Cambridge University Press
- 3
- Cited by