No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2003
I challenge Jackendoff's claim that semantics should not be paralyzed by a failure to solve Brentano's problem of intentionality. I argue that his account of semantics is in fact paralyzed because it fails to live up to his own standards of naturalization, has no account of falsity, and gives the wrong semantic objects for words and thoughts.
1. Editor's note: “f-mind” stands for “functional mind” (Cf. Foundations, p. 21).