Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:58:02.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-deception is adaptive in itself

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Louisa C. Egan
Affiliation:
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. [email protected]://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/directory/egan_louisa.aspx

Abstract

Von Hippel & Trivers reason that the potential benefits of successfully deceiving others provide a basis for the evolution of self-deception. However, as self-deceptive processes themselves provide considerable adaptive value to an individual, self-deception may have evolved as an end in itself, rather than as the means to an end of improving other-deception.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspinwall, L. G. & Richter, L. (1999) Optimism and self-mastery predict more rapid disengagement from unsolvable tasks in presence of alternatives. Motivation and Emotion 23:221–45.Google Scholar
Babad, E. (1997) Wishful thinking among voters: Motivational and cognitive influences. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 9:105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. (2010) Wishful seeing: Desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science 21:147–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balcetis, E., Dunning, D. & Miller, R. L. (2008) Do collectivists know themselves better than individualists? Cross-cultural studies of the holier than thou phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95:1252–67.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist 44:1175–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, C. D. & Thompson, E. R. (2001) Why don't moral people act morally? Motivational considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10:5457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. & Goodman, C. C. (1947) Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 42:3344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, L., Bloom, P. & Santos, L. R. (2010) Choice-induced preferences in the absence of choice: Evidence from a blind two choice paradigm with young children and capuchin monkeys. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46:204207.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959) Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58:203–11.Google Scholar
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikstrom, S. & Olsson, A. (2005) Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science 310:116–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizan, Z. & Windschitl, P. D. (2009) Wishful thinking about the future: Does desire impact optimism? Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3:227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riskind, J. H., Moore, R. & Bowley, L. (1995) The looming of spiders: The fearful perceptual distortion of movement and menace. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33:171–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, C. M. & Liu, T. J. (1983) Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Kolligan, J., eds. (1990) Competence considered. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, L. S., Tooby, J., Cosmides, L. (2002) Cross-cultural evidence of cognitive adaptations for social exchange among the Shiwiar of Ecuadorian Amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:11537–45. Available at: http://www.uoregon.edu/~sugiyama/docs/cogadaptsocex.pdf.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. & Armor, D. A. (1996) Positive illusions and coping with adversity. Journal of Personality 64:873–98.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin 103:193210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P. & DeSteno, D. A. (2007) Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science 18:689–90.Google Scholar