Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Schneider, David J.
1992.
Publication Games: Reflections on Reis and Stiller.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
498.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
Rourke, Byron P.
and
Wass, Peter
1992.
Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: Relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 6,
p.
976.
Morrow, James R.
Bray, Molly S.
Fulton, Janet E.
and
Thomas, Jerry R.
1992.
Interrater Reliability of 1987–1991Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportReviews.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
200.
Haaga, David A. F.
1993.
Peer Review of Term Papers in Graduate Psychology Courses.
Teaching of Psychology,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
28.
Crothers, Charles
1993.
Peer review reliability: The hierarchy of the sciences.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
398.
Rubin, Haya R.
Redelmeier, Donald A.
Wu, Albert W.
and
Steinberg, Earl P.
1993.
How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts?.
Journal of General Internal Medicine,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 5,
p.
255.
Luce, R. Duncan
1993.
Reliability is neither to be expected nor desired in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
399.
1993.
A note from the editor.
Sociological Forum,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1993.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: “It's like déjà vu all over again!”.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
401.
Sinclair, J. D.
1993.
Drop censorship in science.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
400.
Plug, Cornells
1993.
The Reliability of Manuscript Evaluation for the South African Journal of Psychology.
South African Journal of Psychology,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
Kostoff, Ronald N.
1994.
Quantitative/qualitative federal research impact evaluation practices.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 2,
p.
189.
Kane, Michael
1994.
Validating the Performance Standards Associated With Passing Scores.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 3,
p.
425.
Fuller, Steve
1994.
The social epistemologist in search of a position from which to argue.
Argumentation,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
163.
Kostoff, Ronald N.
1995.
Research requirements for research impact assessment.
Research Policy,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 6,
p.
869.
Beyer, J. M.
Chanove, R. G.
and
Fox, W. B.
1995.
THE REVIEW PROCESS AND THE FATES OF MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO AMJ..
Academy of Management Journal,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 5,
p.
1219.
Harnad, Stevan
1995.
Sorting the esoteica from the exoterica: There's plenty of room in cyberspace — a response to fuller.
The Information Society,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 4,
p.
305.
Thompson, Bruce
1995.
Publishing Your Research Results: Some Suggestions and Counsel.
Journal of Counseling & Development,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 3,
p.
342.
Hubbard, Raymond
and
Murray Lindsay, R.
1995.
Caveat Emptor Applies to the Consumption of Published Empirical Research Results, Too.
Management Research News,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 10/11,
p.
49.
Hubbard, Raymond
1995.
The Commodification of Marketing Knowledge: It's Not Enough to Count the Numbers.
Journal of Marketing Management,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 7,
p.
671.