Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:11:30.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relational processing in conceptual combination and analogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Zachary Estes  and
Lara L. Jones
Zachary Estes
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
Lara L. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC 29501. [email protected]://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/psych/people/academic/[email protected]://acsweb.fmarion.edu/ljones/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptual combination. Although an additional mechanism for role resolution may be required, relational priming offers a promising approach to analogy.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 385 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Estes, Z. (2003) Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language 48:304–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, Z. & Jones, L. L. (2006) Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language 55(1):89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenker, D. B., Waldmann, M. R. & Holyoak, K. J. (2005) Accessing causal relations in semantic memory. Memory & Cognition 33:1036–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagné, C. L. (2001) Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun–noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27:236–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L. & Ji, H. (2005) Re-examining evidence for the use of independent relational representations during conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 53:445–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, J. E. & Holyoak, K. J. (2003) A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review 110:220–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raffray, C. N., Pickering, M. J. & Branigan, H. P. (2007) Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language 57:380–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (2001) Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory and Cognition 29:383–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed