Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T22:13:09.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redeployed functions versus spreading activation: A potential confound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Colin Klein
Colin Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607. [email protected]://tigger.uic.edu/~cvklein/links.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anderson's meta-analysis of fMRI data is subject to a potential confound. Areas identified as active may make no functional contribution to the task being studied, or may indicate regions involved in the coordination of functional networks rather than information processing per se. I suggest a way in which fMRI adaptation studies might provide a useful test between these alternatives.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 280 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, M. L. (2007b) Massive redeployment, exaptation, and the functional integration of cognitive operations. Synthese 159(3):329–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. L. (2007c) The massive redeployment hypothesis and the functional topography of the brain. Philosophical Psychology 21(2):143–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crinion, J., Turner, R., Grogan, A., Hanakawa, T., Noppeney, U., Devlin, J. T., Aso, T., Urayama, A., Fukuyama, H., Stockton, K., Usui, K., Green, D. W. & Price, C. J. (2006) Language control in the bilingual brain. Science 312(5779):1537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logothetis, N. K. (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453:869–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T. & Oeltermann, A. (2001) Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412(6843):150–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A. (2008) A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris 102(1–3):59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, D. G. (2005) About being BOLD. Brain Research Reviews 50:229–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Striedter, G. F. (2005) Principles of brain evolution. Sinauer.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, A. & Freeman, R. D. (2007) Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity. Nature Neuroscience 10(10):1308–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed