Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:52:37.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reasoning, argumentation, and cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

Keith Frankish
Keith Frankish
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/philos/frankish.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary does three things. First, it offers further support for the view that explicit reasoning evolved for public argumentation. Second, it suggests that promoting effective communication may not be the only, or even the main, function of public argumentation. Third, it argues that the data Mercier and Sperber (M&S) cite are compatible with the view that reasoning has subsequently been co-opted to play a role in individual cognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 79 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bratman, M. E. (1987) Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (1996) Language, thought and consciousness: An essay in philosophical psychology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (1998) Conscious thinking: Language or elimination? Mind and Language 13:457–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankish, K. (1998) Natural language and virtual belief. In: Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes, ed. Carruthers, P. & Boucher, J., pp. 248–69. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankish, K. (2004) Mind and supermind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankish, K. (2009) Systems and levels: Dual-system theories and the personal-subpersonal distinction. In: In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, ed. Evans, J. St. B. T. & Frankish, K., pp. 89–107. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1999) Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar