Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:01:49.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychology supports independence of phenomenal consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2008

Tyler Burge
Tyler Burge
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inference-to-best-explanation from psychological evidence supports the view that phenomenal consciousness in perceptual exposures occurs before limited aspects of that consciousness are retained in working memory. Independently of specific neurological theory, psychological considerations indicate that machinery producing phenomenal consciousness is independent of machinery producing working memory, hence independent of access to higher cognitive capacities.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 5-6 , December 2007 , pp. 500 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, J. (2001) The contribution of working memory to conscious experience. In: Working memory in perspective, ed. Andrade, J.. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H. & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003) Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research 43(2):149–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, D. G. (2001) Imagery and the visuo-spatial sketchpad. In: Working memory in perspective, ed. Andrade, J.. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rousselet, G. A., Thorpe, S. J. & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2004a) How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway? Trends in Cognitive Science 8:363–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousselet, G. A., Thorpe, S. J. & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2004b) Processing of one, two, or four natural scenes in humans: The limits of parallelism. Vision Research 44: 877–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S. & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008) Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? Plos One 3(2):1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperling, G. (1960) The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74(11, Whole No. 498):1–29. [Whole issue.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanRullen, R. V. & Thorpe, S. J. (2001) Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorization of natural and artificial objects. Perception 30:655–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar