Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:22:05.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The problems that generate the rationality debate are too easy, given what our economy now demands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2004

Selmer Bringsjord  and
Yingrui Yang
Selmer Bringsjord*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The Minds and Machines Laboratory, Psychology and Cognitive Science, and Department of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY12180www.rpi.edu/~brings
Yingrui Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The Minds and Machines Laboratory, Psychology and Cognitive Science, and Department of Computer Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY12180www.rpi.edu/~brings
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Stanovich & West (S&W), following all relevant others, define the rationality debate in terms of human performance on certain well-known problems. Unfortunately, these problems are very easy. For that reason, if System 2 cognition is identified with the capacity to solve them, such cognition will not enable humans to meet the cognitive demands of our technological society. Other profound issues arise as well.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 528 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

Commentary on Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F. “Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?” BBS 23(5):645–726 [October 2000]