Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T19:23:23.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptual symbols in language comprehension: Can an empirical case be made?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1999

Rolf A. Zwaan ,
Robert A. Stanfield  and
Carol J. Madden
Rolf A. Zwaan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1270 freud.psy.fsu.edu:80/~zwaan/
Robert A. Stanfield
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1270 freud.psy.fsu.edu:80/~zwaan/
Carol J. Madden
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1270 freud.psy.fsu.edu:80/~zwaan/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perceptual symbol systems form a theoretically plausible alternative to amodal symbol systems. At this point it is unclear whether there is any truly diagnostic empirical evidence to decide between these systems. We outline some possible avenues of research in the domain of language comprehension that might yield such evidence. Language comprehension will be an important arena for tests of the two types of symbol systems.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , August 1999 , pp. 636 - 637
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable