Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T04:14:19.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the systematic social role of expressed emotions: An embodied perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Nicolas Vermeulen
Nicolas Vermeulen
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; and National Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), Belgium. [email protected]://www.ecsa.ucl.ac.be/personnel/vermeulen/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vigil suggests that expressed emotions are inherently learned and triggered in social contexts. A strict reading of this account is not consistent with the findings that individuals, even those who are congenitally blind, do express emotions in the absence of an audience. Rather, grounded cognition suggests that facial expressions might also be an embodied support used to represent emotional information.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 405 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aleman, A. & Swart, M. (2008) Sex differences in neural activation to facial expressions denoting contempt and disgust. PLoS ONE 3:e3622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:577–660.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:617–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimberg, U. (1982) Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology 19:643–47.Google Scholar
Dimberg, U. (1990) Facial electromyography and emotional reactions. Psychophysiology 27:481–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elfenbein, H. & Ambady, N. (2002) On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 128:203–35.Google Scholar
Gur, R. C., Gunning-Dixon, F., Bilker, W. B. & Gur, R. E. (2002) Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults. Cerebral Cortex 12:998–1003.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. & Willingham, B. (2006) The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat: Spontaneous expressions of medal winners of the 2004 Athens Olympic Games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:568–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, D. & Willingham, B. (2009) Spontaneous facial expressions of emotion of congenitally and noncongenitally blind individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96:1–10.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007) Embodying emotion. Science 316:1002–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., Halberstadt, J. B. & Innes-Ker, A. H. (2001) When did her smile drop? Contrast effects in the influence of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition and Emotion 15:853–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M. & Maringer, M. (2009) Embodied emotion considered. Emotion Review 1: 122–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L. & Vermeulen, N.(in press)Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Oberman, L. M., Winkielman, P. & Ramachandran, V. S. (2007) Face to face: Blocking facial mimicry can selectively impair recognition of emotional expressions. Social Neuroscience 2:167–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, F., Martin, L. L. & Stepper, S. (1988) Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:768–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R. & Barsalou, L. W. (2008) Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cognitive Science 32:579–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeulen, N., Corneille, O. & Niedenthal, P. M. (2008) Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs. Cognition 109:287–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeulen, N., Niedenthal, P. M. & Luminet, O. (2007) Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs. Cognitive Science 31:183–92.Google Scholar