Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:13:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On formal universals in phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Andrew Nevins
Andrew Nevins
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139. [email protected]/~nevins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the universal aspects of human language structure requires comparison at multiple levels of analysis. While Evans & Levinson (E&L) focus mostly on substantive variation in language, equally revealing insights can come from studying formal universals. I first discuss how Artificial Grammar Experiments can test universal preferences for certain types of abstract phonological generalizations over others. I then discuss moraic onsets in the language Arrernte, and how its apparent substantive variation ultimately rests on a formal universal regarding syllable-weight sensitivity.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 461 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blevins, J. (2001) Where have all the onsets gone? Initial consonant loss in Australian aboriginal languages. In: Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages, ed. Simpson, J., Nash, D., Laughren, M., Austin, P. & Alpher, B., pp. 481–92. Pacific Linguistics 512. The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Breen, G. & Pensalfini, R. (1999) Arrernte: A language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1):1–26.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1988) Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, L. (1998) On the prosodic misalignment of onsetless syllables. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16:1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedemans, R. (1998) Weightless segments. Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2005) A perceptually-driven account of onset-sensitive stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23:595–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. L. (1964) Classification of northern Paman languages, Cape York Peninsula, Australia: A research report. Oceanic Linguistics 3(2):248–64.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1999) Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2):180–205.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1989) Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20:253–306.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985) A theory of phonological weight. (Publications in Language Sciences 19). Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1986) Prosodic morphology 1986. Report No. RuCCS-TR-32. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Available at: http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/pub/papers/pm86all.pdf.Google Scholar
Moreton, E. (2008) Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25(1):83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, B. (1970) An Australian language without CV syllables. International Journal of American Linguistics 36:57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, B. (1981) The shape of Kunjen syllables. In: Phonology in the 1980's, ed. Goyvaerts, D. L., pp. 231–44. E. Story-Scientia.Google Scholar
Topintzi, N. (2009) Onsets: An exploration of their suprasegmental and prosodic behaviour. Unpublished book manuscript, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar