Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:30:04.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On computational and behavioral evidence regarding Hebbian transcortical cell assemblies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

Michael Spivey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 {spivey;mwa1;dcr18}@cornell.edu www.psych.cornell.edu/Psychology/Spivey/homepage.html www.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/Mark W. Andrews.htm www.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/Daniel C. Richardson.htm
Mark Andrews
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 {spivey;mwa1;dcr18}@cornell.edu www.psych.cornell.edu/Psychology/Spivey/homepage.html www.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/Mark W. Andrews.htm www.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/Daniel C. Richardson.htm
Daniel Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 {spivey;mwa1;dcr18}@cornell.edu www.psych.cornell.edu/Psychology/Spivey/homepage.html www.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/Mark W. Andrews.htm www.psych.cornell.edu/graduates/people/Daniel C. Richardson.htm

Abstract

Pulvermüller restricts himself to an unnecessarily narrow range of evidence to support his claims. Evidence from neural modeling and behavioral experiments provides further support for an account of words encoded as transcortical cell assemblies. A cognitive neuroscience of language must include a range of methodologies (e.g., neural, computational, and behavioral) and will need to focus on the on-line processes of real-time language processing in more natural contexts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)