Article contents
Notational systems are distinct cognitive systems with different material prehistories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2023
Abstract
Notations are cognitive systems involving distinctive psychological functions, behaviors, and material forms. Seen through this lens, two main types – semasiography and visible language – are fundamentally differentiated by their material prehistories, emphasis on iconography, and the centrality of language's combinatorial faculty. These fundamental differences suggest that key qualities (iconicity, expressiveness, concision) are difficult to conjoin in a single system.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: Evidence for a major subdivision within the brain's semantic networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1740), 20160515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56(2), 384–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240–9245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grotheer, M., Ambrus, G. G., & Kovács, G. (2016). Causal evidence of the involvement of the number form area in the visual detection of numbers and letters. NeuroImage, 132, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, B. B. (2008). Language and music: What do they have in common and how do they differ? A neuroscientific approach. European Review, 16(4), 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, K., Kuo, W.-J., Pegado, F., Cohen, L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Dehaene, S. (2012). Universal brain systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(50), 20762–20767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overmann, K. A. (2016). Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the Ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(2), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmann, K. A. (2022). Early writing: A cognitive archaeological perspective on literacy and numeracy. Visible Language, 56(1), 8–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmann, K. A. (2023). The materiality of numbers: Emergence and elaboration from prehistory to present. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L.-H. (2013). Write to read: The brain's universal reading and writing network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(2), 56–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, F., Dufor, O., Giussani, C., Wamain, Y., Draper, L., Longcamp, M., & Démonet, J. (2009). The graphemic/motor frontal area Exner's area revisited. Annals of Neurology, 66(4), 537–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12(4), 323–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandervert, L. R. (2017). The origin of mathematics and number sense in the cerebellum: With implications for finger counting and dyscalculia. Cerebellum & Ataxias, 4(12), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 1
- Cited by
Target article
The puzzle of ideography
Related commentaries (26)
A bigger problem for ideography: The pervasiveness of linguistic structure
A cognitive account of the puzzle of ideography
A source- and channel-coding approach to the analysis and design of languages and ideographies
Bypass language en route to meaning at your peril
Chinese offers a test for universal cognitive processes
Communication consistency, completeness, and complexity of digital ideography in trustworthy mobile extended reality
Emoji use validates the potential for meaning standardization among ideographic symbols
Fractals and artificial intelligence to decrypt ideography and understand the evolution of language
Functional ideographies are composite semiotic systems
Graphic codes, language, and the computational niche
How standardized must a code be to be useful?
Ideography in interaction
Ideography insight from facial recognition and neuroimaging
Ideography, Blissymbolics, standardization, and emergent conformity
Mind the gap: Why is there no general purpose ideographic system?
Notational systems are distinct cognitive systems with different material prehistories
On the semiotic and material constraints of ideographies
Pragmatic interpretation and the production of ideographic codes
The centrality of practice in ideographic communication, and the perennial puzzle of positivistic thinking
The design space of human communication and the nonevolution of ideography
The different paths to cultural convergence
The disadvantage of ideography
The feasibility of ideography as an empirical question for a science representational systems design
The stranding of the ideography: A nonnegligible role of the spoken language
Visual languages and the problems with ideographies: A commentary on Morin
Why the use of ideographic codes does not improve communicative skills in patients with severe aphasia?
Author response
Puzzling out graphic codes