Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T22:31:05.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Norms, goals, and the study of thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Raymond S. Nickerson
Raymond S. Nickerson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155. [email protected]://ase.tufts.edu/psychology/peopleNickerson.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans (E&E) argue that the major objective of research on human thinking should be the development of descriptive theories, and they challenge normativism – “the belief that people ought to conform to a normative standard” (target article, sect. 1, para. 10). I contend that although their argument for the importance of developing descriptive theories is compelling, normative theories are also important, not only for improving thinking but for investigating and understanding it as well.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 261 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fox, J. (2003) Probability, logic and the cognitive foundations of rational belief. Journal of Applied Logic 1:197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., Beveridge, D. & Glasspool, D. (2003) Understanding intelligent agents: Analysis and synthesis. AI Communications 16:139–52.Google Scholar
Fox, J. & Parsons, S. (1998) Arguing about beliefs and actions. In: Applications of uncertain formalisms, ed. Hunter, A. & Parsons, S., pp. 266–302. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, G. A. (1998) Sources of power: How people make decisions. MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1988) Whose justice? Whose rationality? Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Pliske, R. & Klein, G. (2003) The naturalistic decision-making perspective. In: Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research, ed. Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J., pp. 559–85. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zsambok, C. E. & Klein, G., ed. (1997) Naturalistic decision making. Erlbaum.Google Scholar