Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:27:44.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Norms for reasoning about decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Jean-François Bonnefon
Jean-François Bonnefon
Affiliation:
CNRS and Université de Toulouse, CLLE, Maison de la Recherche, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reasoning research has traditionally focused on the derivation of beliefs from beliefs, but it is increasingly turning to reasoning about decisions. In the absence of a single, entrenched normative model, the drive toward normativism is weaker in this new field than in its parent fields. The current balance between normativism and descriptivism is illustrated by three approaches to reasoning about decisions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 249 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C. L., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009) Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 113:329–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benferhat, S., Bonnefon, J. F. & Da, Silva Neves, R. (2005) An overview of possibilistic handling of default reasoning, with experimental studies. Synthese 146:53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnefon, J. F. (2009) A theory of utility conditionals: Paralogical reasoning from decision-theoretic leakage. Psychological Review 116:888–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonnefon, J. F., Dubois, D., Fargier, H. & Leblois, S. (2008) Qualitative heuristics for balancing the pros and cons. Theory and Decision 65:71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Y. & Pfeffer, A. (2008) Networks of influence diagrams: A formalism for representing agents' beliefs and decision-making processes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 33:109–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagmayer, Y. & Sloman, S. A. (2009) Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138:22–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed