Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:30:26.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-abstractness as mental simulation in the representation of number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2009

Andriy Myachykov
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.dundee.ac.uk/psychology/people/research/amyachykov/[email protected]://www.dundee.ac.uk/psychology/people/academics/mhfischer/index.htm
Wouter P. A. Platenburg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3000DR, The Netherlands. [email protected]
Martin H. Fischer
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.dundee.ac.uk/psychology/people/research/amyachykov/[email protected]://www.dundee.ac.uk/psychology/people/academics/mhfischer/index.htm

Abstract

Abstraction is instrumental for our understanding of how numbers are cognitively represented. We propose that the notion of abstraction becomes testable from within the framework of simulated cognition. We describe mental simulation as embodied, grounded, and situated cognition, and report evidence for number representation at each of these levels of abstraction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, M., Ostry, D. J., Nicol, F. & Paus, T. (2008) Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping. Cortex 44:414–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:617–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K. & Wilson, C. D. (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: Symbols, embodiment, and meaning, ed. De Vega, M., Glenberg, A. M. & Graesser, A. C., pp. 245–83. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. H. (2003) Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological Science 14(3):278–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M. H. (2006) The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex 42(8):1066–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M. H. (2008) Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex 44(4):386–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M. H. & Campens, H. (2008) Pointing to numbers and grasping magnitudes. Experimental Brain Research 192(1):149–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M. H. & Rottmann, J. (2005) Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line? Psychology Science 47(1):2232.Google Scholar
Pinhas, M. & Fischer, M. H. (2008) Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition 109:408–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platenburg, W. P. A., Myachykov, A. & Fischer, M. H. (in preparation) Interplay between the representational features in number processing.Google Scholar
Schwarz, W. & Keus, I. M. (2004) Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception and Psychophysics 66:651–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed