No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The multiple relations between vision and touch: Neonatal behavioral evidence and adult neuroimaging data
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2007
Abstract
Neonatal behavioral data support the argument that multiple relations exist between vision and touch. Looking at an object triggers the motion of a neonate's arm and hand towards it. A textured surface that is seen can be recognized tactilely, but not a volumetric shaped object in cross-modal transfer tasks. These data are supported by adult neuroimaging data.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
References
Connolly, K. & Jones, B. (1970) A developmental study of afferent-reafferent integration. British Journal of Psychology 61:259–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatwell, Y. (1994) Transferts intermodaux et intégration intermodale. In: Traité de Psychologie Expérimentale, vol. 1, ed. Richelle, M., Requin, J. & Robert, M., pp. 543–84. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1986) The formation of the finger grip during prehension: A cortically-mediated visuo-motor pattern. In: Themes in motor development, ed. Whiting, H. T. A. & Wade, W. G.. Martinus Nijhoffi.Google Scholar
Jones, B. & Connolly, K. (1970) Memory effects in cross-modal matching. British Journal of Psychology 61:267–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juurmaa, J. & Lehtinen-Railo, S. (1988) Cross-modal transfer of forms between vision and touch. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 29(2):95–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merabet, L., Thut, G., Murray, B., Andrews, J., Hsiao, S. & Pascual-Leone, A. (2004) Feeling by sight or seeing by touch? Neuron 42:173–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newham, C. & McKenzie, B. E. (1993) Cross-modal transfer of sequential visual and haptic information by clumsy children. Perception 22:1061–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltier, S., Stilla, R., Mariola, E., LaConte, S., Hu, X. & Sathian, K. (2007) Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perception. Neuropsychologia 45(3):476–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, C. L., Klatzky, R. L. & Halgren, E. (2005) What vs. where in touch: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 25:718–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, P. E., O'Sullivan, B. & Kawashima, R. (1998) Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:3295–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, S. A. & Orlian, E. K. (1991) Asymmetries in infant cross-modal transfer. Child Development 62:706–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sann, C. & Streri, A. (2007) Perception of object shape and texture in newborn infants: Evidence from cross-modal tasks. Developmental Science 10(3):398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streri, A. (1987) Tactile discrimination of shape and intermodal transfer in 2- to 3-month-old infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5:213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streri, A. (1993) Seeing, reaching, touching: The relations between vision and touch in infancy. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Streri, A. & Gentaz, E. (2003) Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes in human newborns. Somatosensory and Motor Research 20:11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streri, A. & Gentaz, E. (2004) Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes and handedness in human newborns. Neuropsychologia 42(10):1365–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hofsten, C. (1982) Eye-hand coordination in the newborn. Developmental Psychology 18:450–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hofsten, C. & Rönnqvist, L. (1988) Preparation for grasping an object: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14:610–21.Google ScholarPubMed