Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:54:00.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multifaceted functional specialization of somatosensory information processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2007

K. Sathian ,
Simon Lacey ,
Gregory Gibson  and
Randall Stilla
K. Sathian
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; [email protected]@[email protected]://www.emory.edu/NEUROSCIENCE/facultyprofiles_Z.html#sathian_k Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; Atlanta VAMC Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence, Decatur, GA 30033. [email protected]
Simon Lacey
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; [email protected]@[email protected]://www.emory.edu/NEUROSCIENCE/facultyprofiles_Z.html#sathian_k
Gregory Gibson
Affiliation:
Atlanta VAMC Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence, Decatur, GA 30033. [email protected]
Randall Stilla
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; [email protected]@[email protected]://www.emory.edu/NEUROSCIENCE/facultyprofiles_Z.html#sathian_k
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We review evidence for multifaceted functional specialization of somatosensory information processing, both within and outside classical somatosensory cortex. We argue that the nature of such specialization has not yet been clarified adequately to regard the proposed action/perception dichotomy as being established. However, we believe this is a good working hypothesis that can motivate further work.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 219 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alivisatos, B. & Petrides, M. (1997) Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 36:111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amedi, A., Malach, R., Hendler, T., Peled, S. & Zohary, E. (2001) Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience 4:324–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, H. (1986) Second somatosensory cortex and related areas. In: Cerebral cortex, ed. Jones, E. G. & Peters, A., pp. 31–98. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Caselli, R. J. (1993) Ventrolateral and dorsomedial somatosensory association cortex damage produces distinct somethetic syndromes in humans. Neurology 43:762–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickhoff, S. B., Amunts, K., Mohlberg, H. & Zilles, K. (2006a) The human parietal operculum. II. Stereotaxic maps and correlation with functional imaging results. Cerebral Cortex 16:268–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eickhoff, S. B., Schleicher, A., Zilles, K. & Amunts, K. (2006b) The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. Cerebral Cortex 16:254–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, P. J., Lane, J. W., Thakur, P. H. & Hsiao, S. S. (2004) Receptive field properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: Evidence for multiple functional representations. Journal of Neuroscience 24:11193–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, S. H., Vinton, D., Norlund, R. & Grafton, S. T. (2005) Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. Cognitive Brain Research 23:397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grefkes, C., Geyer, S., Schormann, T., Roland, P. & Zilles, K. (2001) Human somatosensory area 2: Observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping, interindividual variability, and population map. NeuroImage 14:617–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grefkes, C., Weiss, P. H., Zilles, K. & Fink, G. R. (2002) Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: An fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 35:173–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, W., Tremblay, F. & Chapman, C. E. (1997) Neuronal encoding of texture changes in the primary and the secondary somatosensory cortical areas of monkeys during passive texture discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology 77:1656–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J. S. (2007) Patterns of sensory abnormality in cortical stroke: Evidence for a dichotomized sensory system. Neurology 68:174–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J. & Reed, C. L. (1987) There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116:356–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, K. W. & Fuster, J. M. (1989) Unit activity in monkey parietal cortex related to haptic perception and temporary memory. Experimental Brain Research 76:292–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledberg, A., O'Sullivan, B. T., Kinomura, S. & Roland, P. E. (1995) Somatosensory activations of the parietal operculum of man: A PET study. European Journal of Neuroscience 7:1934–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M. & Sakata, H. (2000) Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology 83:2580–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, E. A. & Mishkin, M. (1984) Relative contributions of SII and area 5 to tactile discrimination in monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research 11:67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Sullivan, B. T., Roland, P. E. & Kawashima, R. (1994) A PET study of somatosensory discrimination in man: Microgeometry versus macrogeometry. European Journal of Neuroscience 6:137–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peltier, S., Stilla, R., Mariola, E., LaConte, S., Hu, X. & Sathian, K. (2007) Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perception. Neuropsychologia 45(3):476–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prather, S. C., Votaw, J. R. & Sathian, K. (2004) Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception. Neuropsychologia 42:1079–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruett, J., Sinclair, R. J. & Burton, H. (2000) Response patterns in second somatosensory cortex (SII) of awake monkeys to passively applied tactile gratings. Journal of Neurophysiology 84:780–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randolph, M. & Semmes, J. (1974) Behavioral consequences of selective subtotal ablations in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. Brain Research 70:55–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, C. L., Caselli, R. J. & Farah, M. J. (1996) Tactile agnosia: Underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. Brain 119:875–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, C. L., Klatzky, R. L. & Halgren, E. (2005) What vs. where in touch: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 25:718–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, C. L., Shoham, S. & Halgren, E. (2004) Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 21:236–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, P. E. (1987) Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia after localized lesions of cerebral hemispheres in man. Brain Research Reviews 12:43–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, P. E., O'Sullivan, B. & Kawashima, R. (1998) Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95:3295–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, D. N., Okada, T., Morita, Y., Yonekura, Y. & Sadato, N. (2003) Tactile-visual cross-modal shape matching: A functional MRI study. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 17:14–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Sathian, K. (2005) Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and visually deprived. Developmental Psychobiology 46(3):279–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathian, K. (2007) Subspecialization within somatosensory cortex. Commentary on Kim (2007). Neurology 68:167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sathian, K., Zangaladze, A., Hoffman, J. M. & Grafton, S. T. (1997) Feeling with the mind's eye. NeuroReport 8:3877–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Servos, P., Lederman, S., Wilson, D. & Gati, J. (2001) fMRI-derived cortical maps for haptic shape, texture and hardness. Cognitive Brain Research 12:307–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, R. J., Pruett, J. R. & Burton, H. (1996) Responses in primary somatosensory cortex of rhesus monkey to controlled application of embossed grating and bar patterns. Somatosensory and Motor Research 13:287–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stilla, R., Mariola, E. & Sathian, K. (2006) Haptic and multisensory selectivity for texture and shape in cerebral cortex. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts No. 137.15.Google Scholar
van Boven, R. W., Ingeholm, J. E., Beauchamp, M. S., Bikle, P. C. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2005) Tactile form and location processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:12601–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zangaladze, A., Epstein, C. M., Grafton, S. T. & Sathian, K. (1999) Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature 401:587–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, M., Mariola, E., Stilla, R., Stoesz, M., Mao, H., Hu, X. & Sathian, K. (2005) Tactile discrimination of grating orientation: fMRI activation patterns. Human Brain Mapping 25:370–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, M., Weisser, V. D., Stilla, R., Prather, S. C. & Sathian, K. (2004) Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 4:251–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed