No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2008
Abstract
We agree that the relationship between phenomenology and accessibility can be fruitfully investigated via meshing, but we want to emphasise the importance of proper comparison between meshes, as well as considerations that make comparison especially difficult in this domain. We also argue that Block's interpretation of the neural data in his exemplar mesh is incorrect, and propose an alternative.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
References
Mackay, D. J. C. (2004) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, A. & Walsh, V. (2001) Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science 292(5516):510–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollen, D. A. (1999) On the neural correlates of visual perception. Cerebral Cortex 9(1):4–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. & Bartels, A. (1999) Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8(2):225–59.Google Scholar
Zeki, S. & ffytche, D. H. (1998) The Ridoch syndrome: Insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. Brain 121(Pt 1):25–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed