No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mental model construction, not just memory, is a central component of cognitive change in psychotherapy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2015
Abstract
We challenge the idea that a cognitive perspective on therapeutic change concerns only memory processes. We argue that inclusion of impairments in more generative cognitive processes is necessary for complete understanding of cases such as depression. In such cases what is identified in the target article as an “integrative memory structure” is crucially supported by processes of mental model construction.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Brewer, W. F. (1987) Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In: Modelling cognition, ed. Morris, P., pp. 187–97. Wiley.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Sedek, G., von Hecker, U. & McIntosh, D. N., eds. (2005) Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garnham, A. (1997) Representing information in mental models. In: Cognitive models of memory, ed. Conway, M. A., pp. 149–72. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gotlib, I. H. & Hammen, C. L. (1992) Psychological aspects of depression: Toward a cognitive-interpersonal integration. Wiley.Google Scholar
Greeno, J. G. (1989) Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In: Complex information processing, ed. Klahr, D. & Kotovsky, K., pp. 285–318. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E. & Thagard, P. R. (1986) Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J. & Patterson, K. K. (1981) A positional discriminability model of linear order judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
7:1283–302.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996) Images, models, and propositional representations. In: Models of visuospatial cognition, ed. Vega, M. de, Intons-Peterson, M. J., Johnson-Laird, P. N., Denis, M. & Marschark, M., pp. 90–127. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leth-Steensen, C. & Marley, A. A. J. (2000) A model of response time effect in symbolic comparison. Psychological Review
107:62–100.Google Scholar
McIntosh, D. N., Sedek, G., Fojas, S., Brzezicka-Rotkiewicz, A. & Kofta, M. (2005) Cognitive performance after preexposure to uncontrollability and in a depressive state: Going with a simpler “Plan B.” In: Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology, ed. Engle, R. W., Sedek, G., von Hecker, U. & McIntosh, D. N., pp. 219–46. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedek, G., Brzezicka, A. & von Hecker, U. (2010) The unique cognitive limitation in subclinical depression: The impairment of mental model construction. In: Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control, ed. Gruszka, A., Matthews, G. & Szymura, B., pp. 335–52. Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Sedek, G. & Kofta, M. (1990) When cognitive exertion does not yield cognitive gain: Toward an informational explanation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
58:729–43.Google Scholar
Sedek, G. & von Hecker, U. (2004) Effects of subclinical depression and aging on generative reasoning about linear orders: Same or different processing limitations?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
133:237–60.Google Scholar
von Hecker, U., Crockett, W. H., Hummert, M. L. & Kemper, S. (1996) Social cliques as mental models. European Journal of Social Psychology
26:741–49.Google Scholar
von Hecker, U., Dutke, S. & Sedek, G., eds. (2000) Generative mental processes and cognitive resources: Integrative research on adaptation and control. Kluwer.Google Scholar
von Hecker, U. & Sedek, G. (1999) Uncontrollability, depression, and the construction of mental models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
77:833–50.Google Scholar
von Hecker, U., Sedek, G. & Brzezicka, A. (2013) Impairments in mental model construction and benefits of defocused attention: Distinctive facets of subclinical depression. European Psychologist
18(1):35–46.Google Scholar
Target article
Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science
Related commentaries (28)
A clinician's perspective on memory reconsolidation as the primary basis for psychotherapeutic change in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1
Changing maladaptive memories through reconsolidation: A role for sleep in psychotherapy?
Clinical applications of counterfactual thinking during memory reactivation
Deconstructing the process of change in cognitive behavioral therapy: An alternative approach focusing on the episodic retrieval mode
Disruption of reconsolidation processes is a balancing act – can it really account for change in psychotherapy?
Emotion regulation as a main mechanism of change in psychotherapy
Focus on emotion as a catalyst of memory updating during reconsolidation
How do we remember traumatic events? Exploring the role of neuromodulation
How does psychotherapy work? A case study in multilevel explanation
Let's be skeptical about reconsolidation and emotional arousal in therapy
Memory reconsolidation and psychotherapeutic process
Memory reconsolidation and self-reorganization
Memory reconsolidation keeps track of emotional changes, but what will explain the actual “processing”?
Memory reconsolidation, repeating, and working through: Science and culture in psychotherapeutic research and practice
Mental model construction, not just memory, is a central component of cognitive change in psychotherapy
Minding the findings: Let's not miss the message of memory reconsolidation research for psychotherapy
Multiple traces or Fuzzy Traces? Converging evidence for applications of modern cognitive theory to psychotherapy
Psychopathology arises from intertemporal bargaining as well as from emotional trauma
Reconsolidation or re-association?
Reconsolidation versus retrieval competition: Rival hypotheses to explain memory change in psychotherapy
Reconsolidation: Turning consciousness into memory
Social-psychological evidence for the effective updating of implicit attitudes1
The importance of the rites of passage in assigning semantic structures to autobiographical memory
The nature of the semantic/episodic memory distinction: A missing piece of the “working through” process
The relevance of maintaining and worsening processes in psychopathology
Therapeutic affect reduction, emotion regulation, and emotional memory reconsolidation: A neuroscientific quandary
Top-down versus bottom-up perspectives on clinically significant memory reconsolidation
Trade-offs between the accuracy and integrity of autobiographical narrative in memory reconsolidation
Author response
The integrated memory model: A new framework for understanding the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy