Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:12:13.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language as ergonomic perfection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ [email protected]://dingo.sbs.arizona.edu/~massimo/
Roeland Hancock
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. [email protected]@u.arizona.eduhttp://www.ic.arizona.edu/~psylin/bever.html
Thomas Bever
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ [email protected]://dingo.sbs.arizona.edu/~massimo/

Abstract

Christiansen & Chater (C&C) have taken the interactionist approach to linguistic universals to an extreme, adopting the metaphor of language as an organism. This metaphor adds no insights to five decades of analyzing language universals as the result of interaction of linguistically unique and general cognitive systems. This metaphor is also based on an outmoded view of classical Darwinian evolution and has no clear basis in biology or cognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bever, T. G. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Cognition and language development, ed. Hayes, R., pp. 277360. Wiley.Google Scholar
Blencowe, B. J. (2006) Alternative splicing: New insights from global analyses. Cell 126:3747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S. B. (2001) Chance and necessity: The evolution of morphological complexity and diversity. Nature 409:1102–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, C. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2001) Sequential learning in non-human primates. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:539–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, T. W. (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. W. W. Norton/Penguin.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schibotz, R. I. & Anwander, A. (2006) The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:2458–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, G. (2005) Systems biology: The origins of stability. Science 310:237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiom, K., Melek, M. & Gellert, M. (1998) DNA transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins: A possible source of oncogenic translocations. Cell 94:463–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyle, F. (1983) The intelligent universe. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Buechel, C. & Weiller, C. (2003) Broca's area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6:774–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersson, K. M., Forkstam, C. & Ingvar, M. (2004) Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region. Cognitive Science 28:383407.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1997) How the mind works. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Quinn, A. E., Georges, A., Sarre, S. D., Guarino, F., Ezaz, T. & Graves, J. A. (2007) Temperature sex reversal implies sex gene dosage in a reptile. Science 316:411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronshaugen, M., McGinnis, N. & McGinnis, W. (2002) Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan. Nature 415:914–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, S. L. & Lindquist, S. (1998) Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396:336–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, M. (2007) Universal genome in the origin of metazoa: Thoughts about evolution. Cell Cycle 6:1873–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K., Kirby, S. & Brighton, H. (2003b) Iterated learning: A framework for the emergence of language. Artificial Life 9:371–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, A. (2005) Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar