Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:55:20.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language as a consequence and an enabler of the exercise of higher-order relational capabilities: Evidence from toddlers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Marilyn Shatz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043. [email protected]

Abstract

Data on toddler language acquisition and use support the idea of a cognitive “supermodule” that can resolve contradictory claims about human-animal similarities. Examples of imagination, aesthetic evaluation, theory of mind (ToM), and language learning reveal higher-order, relational, abstract capabilities early on. Although language itself may be a consequence of exercising this supermodule, it enables further cognitive operations on indirect experience to go far beyond animal accomplishments.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S. R. (2004) Dr. Doolittle's delusion. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, G., Halford, G. S., Bunch, K. M., Bowden, D. & Jones, T. (2003) Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development 74(5):1476–99.Google Scholar
Diesendruck, G. & Shatz, M. (2001) Two-year-olds' recognition of hierarchies: Evidence from their interpretation of the semantic relation between object labels. Cognitive Development 16:577–94.Google Scholar
Green, P. (2007) Really thinking about things. New York Times, November 8, D1, D4.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (2002) What do children learn from testimony? In: The cognitive basis of science, ed. Carruthers, P., Stich, S. & Siegal, M., pp. 316–34. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, J. (2007) The abstract nature of syntactic representations: Consequences for a theory of learning. In: Blackwell handbook of language development, ed. Hoff, E. & Shatz, M., pp. 277303. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L. & Bever, T. G. (2002) The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science 26:393424.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1994) A toddler's life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (2007) Revisiting A toddler's life for the toddler years: Conversational participation as a tool for learning across knowledge domains. In: Socioemotional development in the toddler years, ed. Brownell, C. A. & Kopp, C. B., pp. 241–57. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & Backscheider, A. (2001) The development of non-object categories in two-year-olds. Paper presented at the Conference on Early Lexicon AcquisitionLyon, France2001.Google Scholar
Tare, M., Shatz, M. & Gilbertson, L. (2008) Maternal uses of non-object terms in child-directed speech: Color, number and time. First Language 28:87100.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (2002) Understanding the psychological world: Developing a theory of mind. In: Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, ed. Goswami, U., pp. 167–87. Blackwell.Google Scholar