Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:42:03.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is factuality a matter of content?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Gregory Currie
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 [email protected] coombs.anu.edu.au/Depts/RSSS/Philosophy/PhilosophyHome.html

Abstract

Dienes & Perner argue that there is a hierarchy of forms of implicit knowledge. One level of their hierarchy involves factuality, where it may be merely implicit that the state of affairs is supposed to be a real one rather than something imagined or fictional. I argue that the factual or fictional status of a thought or utterance cannot be a matter of concept, implicit or explicit.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)