Article contents
Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 July 2018
Abstract
“Neural coding” is a popular metaphor in neuroscience, where objective properties of the world are communicated to the brain in the form of spikes. Here I argue that this metaphor is often inappropriate and misleading. First, when neurons are said to encode experimental parameters, the neural code depends on experimental details that are not carried by the coding variable (e.g., the spike count). Thus, the representational power of neural codes is much more limited than generally implied. Second, neural codes carry information only by reference to things with known meaning. In contrast, perceptual systems must build information from relations between sensory signals and actions, forming an internal model. Neural codes are inadequate for this purpose because they are unstructured and therefore unable to represent relations. Third, coding variables are observables tied to the temporality of experiments, whereas spikes are timed actions that mediate coupling in a distributed dynamical system. The coding metaphor tries to fit the dynamic, circular, and distributed causal structure of the brain into a linear chain of transformations between observables, but the two causal structures are incongruent. I conclude that the neural coding metaphor cannot provide a valid basis for theories of brain function, because it is incompatible with both the causal structure of the brain and the representational requirements of cognition.
- Type
- Target Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
- 66
- Cited by
Target article
Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain?
Related commentaries (27)
A clash of Umwelts: Anthropomorphism in behavioral neuroscience
A sensorimotor alternative to coding is possible
Abandoning the code metaphor is compatible with semiotic process
Beyond metaphors and semantics: A framework for causal inference in neuroscience
Beyond Neural Coding? Lessons from Perceptual Control Theory
Codes are for messages, not for neurons
Codes, communication and cognition
Codes, functions, and causes: A critique of Brette's conceptual analysis of coding
Encodingism is not just a bad metaphor
Extrinsic and intrinsic representations
From mental representations to neural codes: A multilevel approach
From the “coding metaphor” to a theory of representation
Generative models as parsimonious descriptions of sensorimotor loops
How can we play together? Temporal inconsistencies in neural coding of music
Is coding a relevant metaphor for building AI?
Is information theory, or the assumptions that surround it, holding back neuroscience?
Is “the brain” a helpful metaphor for neuroscience?
Modest and immodest neural codes: Can there be modest codes?
Neural code: Another breach in the wall?
Neural codes – Necessary but not sufficient for understanding brain function
Not just a bad metaphor, but a little piece of a big bad metaphor
Our understanding of neural codes rests on Shannon's foundations
Plasticity of the neural coding metaphor: An unnoticed rhetoric in scientific discourse
Prediction, embodiment, and representation
Quantifying the role of neurons for behavior is a mediation question
The Bayesian brain: What is it and do humans have it?
The origin of the coding metaphor in neuroscience
Author response
Neural coding: The bureaucratic model of the brain