Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:24:09.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is all learning innovation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2007

Luke Rendell ,
William Hoppitt  and
Jeremy Kendal
Luke Rendell
Affiliation:
School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, United Kingdom; [email protected]://bio.st-andrews.ac.uk/staff/[email protected]://bio.st-andrews.ac.uk/staff/wjeh1.htm
William Hoppitt
Affiliation:
School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, United Kingdom; [email protected]://bio.st-andrews.ac.uk/staff/[email protected]://bio.st-andrews.ac.uk/staff/wjeh1.htm
Jeremy Kendal
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3HN, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.dur.ac.uk/jeremy.kendal/index.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on animal innovation is an underdeveloped field, and for this reason we welcome the efforts Ramsey and colleagues have made to stimulate its study in wild populations. However, we feel that in attempting to find an operational definition the authors have overstretched the idea of what we should consider innovation in some areas and over-restricted it in others.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 421 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kummer, H. & Goodall, J. (1985) Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 308:203–14.Google Scholar