Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:07:48.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intelligence and reasoning are not one and the same

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

Ira A. Noveck  and
Jérôme Prado
Ira A. Noveck
Affiliation:
Laboratoire sur le Langage, le Cerveau et la Cognition (L2C2), Institut des Sciences Cognitives, CNRS–Université de Lyon, 69675 Bron, France. [email protected]@isc.cnrs.frwww.isc.cnrs.fr/nov/novmenuen.htm, http://jprado.ifastnet.com/
Jérôme Prado
Affiliation:
Laboratoire sur le Langage, le Cerveau et la Cognition (L2C2), Institut des Sciences Cognitives, CNRS–Université de Lyon, 69675 Bron, France. [email protected]@isc.cnrs.frwww.isc.cnrs.fr/nov/novmenuen.htm, http://jprado.ifastnet.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lest the conjunction “intelligence and reasoning” seduce readers into supposing that the two are of a piece, we point out that analyses made at the superset level concerning intelligence do not readily align with or outperform the scientific advances made via investigations of reasoning, which at best can be viewed as a subset of intelligent behaviour.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 163 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W. & Poldrack, R. A. (2004) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(4):170–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J. & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002a) Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron 33(2):301–11.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Weiss, L. G., Van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Saklofske, D. H., eds. (2003) Culture and children's intelligence: Cross cultural analysis of the WISC–III. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goel, V., Buchel, C., Frith, C. & Dolan, R. J. (2000) Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. NeuroImage 12(5):504–14.Google Scholar
Goel, V. & Dolan, R. J. (2003) Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition 87(1):B11–22.Google Scholar
Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F. & Braver, T. S. (2003) Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience 6(3):316–22.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. L. & Griggs, R. A. (1988) Education and the selection task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26(4):327–30.Google Scholar
Noveck, I. A., Goel, V. & Smith, K. W. (2004) The neural basis of conditional reasoning with arbitrary content. Cortex 40(4–5):613–22.Google Scholar
Politzer, G. (2004) Reasoning, judgement and pragmatics. In: Experimental pragmatics, ed. Noveck, I. A. & Sperber, D.. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Prado, J. & Noveck, I. A. (2006) How reaction times elucidate the matching bias and the way negations are processed. Thinking and Reasoning 12(3):309–28.Google Scholar
Prado, J. & Noveck, I. A. (2007) Overcoming perceptual features in logical reasoning: A parametric fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19:642–57.Google Scholar
Reverberi, C., Toraldo, A., D'Agostini, S. & Skrap, M. (2005) Better without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients. Brain 128(12):2882–90.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth-Edwards, A. B., Kemp, R. D., Rust, A. L., Muirhead, J. G. L., Hartman, N. P. & Radloff, S. E. (2004) Cross-cultural effects on IQ test performance: A review and preliminary normative indications on WAIS-III test performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 26(7):903–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5):645–65.Google Scholar