Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:40:27.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-group loyalty or out-group avoidance? Isolating the links between pathogens and in-group assortative sociality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Elizabeth Cashdan
Elizabeth Cashdan
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0060. [email protected]://www.anthro.utah.edu/faculty/elizabeth-cashdan.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article gives two explanations for the correlation between pathogens, family ties, and religiosity: one highlights the benefits of xenophobic attitudes for reducing pathogen exposure, the other highlights the benefits of ethnic loyalty for mitigating the costs when a person falls ill. Preliminary data from traditional societies provide some support for the former explanation but not the latter.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cashdan, E. (2001b) Ethnocentrism and xenophobia: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology 42(5):760–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashdan, E. & Steele, M. (2010) Do pathogens and other risks promote ethnocentrism, xenophobia, and ethnic diversity? Unpublished paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans. November 17–21, 2010.Google Scholar