Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T16:44:04.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of Rosenthal's research for parapsychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Stanley Krippner
Stanley Krippner
Affiliation:
Humanistic Psychology Institute, 325 Ninth Street, San Francisco, Calif. 94103
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 398 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Honorton, C.Replicability, experimenter influence, and parapsychology: An empirical context for the study of mind.Paper presented at AAAS,Washington, D.C.,1978.Google Scholar
Honorton, C., Ramsey, M., & Cabibbo, C.Experimenter effects in extrasensory perception. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 69:135–149, 1975.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Cronquist, A., Danielsson, B. I., & Mondejar, A. S. A test of clairvoyance especially designed for children: A study on the effect of the experimenter-subject relationship on ESP performance. Research Letter of the Parapsychological Division of the Psychological Laboratory of the University of Utrecht, pp 1–8, 1972.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. E. & Taddonio, J. L.Experimenter effects in parapsychological research. Journal of Parapsychology. 40:1–33, 1976.Google Scholar
Krippner, S. (ed.). Advances in Parapsychological Research (Vol. 1) Plenum Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.Psychical research and human personality. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research. 48:1–15, 1949.Google Scholar
Nash, C. B.Comparison of ESP run-score averages of groups liked and disliked by the experimenter. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 62:411–417, 1968.Google Scholar
Rhine, J. B.New experiments in parapsychology. Parapsychology Bulletin. No. 58,1–4, 1961.Google Scholar
Rivers, O. B.An exploratory study of the mental health and intelligence of ESP subjects. Journal of Parapsychology. 14:267–277, 1950.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. The silent language of classrooms and laboratories. In: Roll, W. G., Morris, R. L., & Morris, J. D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association, 1971. Durham, N.C.: Parapsychological Association, 1972.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R.Replicability and experimenter influence: Experimenter effects in behavioral research.Paper presented at AAAS,Washington, D.C.,1978.Google Scholar
Thouless, R. H.The effect of the experimenter–s attitude on experimental results in parapsychology. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 48:261–265, 1976.Google Scholar
White, R. A.The limits of experimenter influence on psi test results: Can any be set? Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 70:333–369, 1976.Google Scholar
White, R. A. The influence of the experimenter on psi test results. In: Wolman, B. B. (ed.). Handbook of Parapsychology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1977.Google Scholar