Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:51:00.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Illuminating reasoning and categorization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Evan Heit  and
Brett K. Hayes
Evan Heit*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, United Kingdomwww.warwick.ac.uk/staff/E.Heit
Brett K. Hayes*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, SydneyNSW 2052, Australiawww.psy.unsw.edu.au
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proposal regarding rules and similarity is considered in terms of ability to provide insights regarding previous work on reasoning and categorization. For reasoning, the issue is the relation between this proposal and one-process as well as two-process accounts of deduction and induction. For categorization, the issue is how the proposal would simultaneously explain both similarity-to-rule and rule-to-similarity shifts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)