Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:43:20.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grandparental investment and the epiphenomenon of menopause in recent human history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2010

Douglas C. Broadfield
Douglas C. Broadfield
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of grandparental investment in relatives are apparent in human groups, suggesting that a postreproductive period in humans is selective. Although investment of relatives in kin produces obvious benefits for kin groups, selection for a postreproductive period in humans is not supported by evidence from chimpanzees. Instead, grandparental investment is likely a recent phenomenon of longevity, rather than an evolved feature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 19 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atsalis, S. & Margulis, S. W. (2008) Perimenopause and menopause: Documenting life changes in aging female gorillas. Interdisciplinary Topics in Gerontology 36:119–46.Google Scholar
Atsalis, S. & Videan, E. N. (2009) Functional versus operational menopause: Reply to Herndon & Lacreuse. American Journal of Primatology 71:893–94.Google Scholar
Bogin, B. & Smith, B. H. (1996) Evolution of the human life cycle. American Journal of Human Biology 8:703–16.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspari, R. & Lee, S.-H. (2004) Older age becomes common late in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:10895–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R. & Vaupel, J. W. (2009) Ageing populations: The challenges ahead. Lancet 374:1196–1208.Google Scholar
Cloutier, C., Broadfield, D. C., Wolf, T. & Halloran, A. R. (2009) A semi-free ranging chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) gives birth at 65 years of age: Implications for delayed reproductive senescence. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Suppl.) 48:107.Google Scholar
Ellison, P. T. (2001) On fertile ground: A natural history of human reproduction. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emery Thompson, M., Jones, J. H., Pusey, A. E., Brewer-Marsden, S., Goodall, J., Marsden, D., Matsuzawa, T., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y. & Wrangham, R. W. (2007) Aging and fertility patterns in wild chimpanzees provide insights into the evolution of menopause. Current Biology 17:2150–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K., Boesch, C., Goodall, J., Pusey, A., Williams, J. & Wrangham, R. (2001) Mortality rates among wild chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution 40:437–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, K. P., Walker, L. C., Anderson, D., Lacreuse, A., Robson, S. L. & Hawkes, K. (2007) Depletion of ovarian follicles with age in chimpanzees: Similarities to humans. Biology of Reproduction 77:247–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhle, B. X. (2007) An evolutionary perspective on the origin and ontogeny of menopause. Maturitas 57:329–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J. K. & Alberman, E. (2009) Trends in Down's syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: Analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register. British Medical Journal 339:b3794.Google Scholar
Peccei, J. S. (2001a) A critique of the grandmother hypotheses: Old and new. American Journal of Human Biology 13:434–52.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411.Google Scholar