Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:28:12.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Four things we need to know about extreme self-sacrifice—CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

Harvey Whitehouse
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e58
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

In the Author's Response to commentaries on the target article by Whitehouse (2018), the author cited an article by Reddish et al. (2016) as showing that social synchrony increased fusion not only with co-participants but also with the extended ingroup and with the outgroup, whereas in fact the study showed that social synchrony increased prosocial (helping) behaviour towards anonymous non-performers who may be ingroup or outgroup members

References

Reddish, P., Jong, J., Lanman, J. A., Tong, E. M. W. & Whitehouse, H. (2016). Collective synchrony increases prosociality towards non-performers and outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology 55(4):722–738. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. (2018). Four things we need to know about extreme self-sacrifice [Author's Response]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41: e222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1800208X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar